Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The definition offered in the first paragraph of that article seems to conjure the exact same imagery in my head that the parent post did. How exactly is he parent off base with this comparison?


The second paragraph:

"As with slaves, serfs could be bought, sold, or traded (...), abused with no rights over their own bodies, could not leave the land they were bound to, and could marry only with their lord's permission."

Does anyone really think this is how Uber drivers live?


You could argue yes but on a grander scale. There are many laws that cover what you can do to your own body and the government claims the output of your labor as theirs. Trump just tried to buy Greenland and the inhabitants. You require papers to leave the country and permission to revoke your citizenship. Marriage (a religious institution) licenses were originally created to prevent different ethnicities from union and are still used to prevent same sex marriages.


Could also be that common usage of words tend to change over time, maybe?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: