> It would also probably have to be adjusted based on location, or as you said it wouldn't do much good in expensive cities, which might reduce that cost further.
Why not just let people move to cheaper places? If they need UBI to survive, NYC is probably not the best place to live.
Otherwise you will have fraud where people have an NYC address so they can collect a large UBI check, but actually live in Oklahoma (or overseas) where their money will go further.
Why not just let people move to cheaper places? If they need UBI to survive, NYC is probably not the best place to live.
Otherwise you will have fraud where people have an NYC address so they can collect a large UBI check, but actually live in Oklahoma (or overseas) where their money will go further.