Dear lord no. I can see how it might come across like that.
More drawing attention to the wider theme that we generally should not take people at their word when we have the option to demand proof of work that can't be faked or mistaken.
These are not trivial algorithms to implement, and the other factorization records require months of work from implementation experts. It's not an easy task, and theory work stands independently of implementation effort.
Still, if this new algorithm could threaten 1024 bit RSA using 10,000 computers for 10,000 days after a 10,000x speed up from optimisation, it should be able to solve the RSA-896 factoring challenge with a single computer for a single day without optimisation, shouldn't it?
After all, 2^896 is 38 orders of magnitude smaller than 2^1024.
It doesn't matter what you claim with words if you can't back it up with cryptographic evidence.
Shut up and prove you've done (or can do) the work.