Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Last.fm Blog: Quality Control (last.fm)
85 points by alex_c on Aug 1, 2008 | hide | past | favorite | 18 comments


I LOVE the analogue meter. Very retro...


That is a freakin' awesome setup! I love the bears and the monitoring displays in the operations room.


Is the analog response-time meter in units of deciseconds?


Seems so. It says "(ds)" underneath it. And judging by their site's responsiveness, it certainly doesn't seem to be milliseconds.


You're saying that last.fm has a 15 second response time?


No, 150 deciseconds would be 1.5 seconds.


That would be centiseconds :p


I hope you don't work for NASA :)


Oh, whoops.


That would be awesome to work at Last.fm... Live in London and get payed in Euros! :D


They don't use Euros in London.


Pounds... even better? You knew what I meant.

The atmosphere here makes you not want to bother posting sometimes to avoid being thrashed by nitpicks


Computer people put a high value on precision because a single semicolon is the difference between a working Linux kernel and a jumble of compile-time errors.


Some places take them... at a punitive exchange rate :)


simply cool


Fresh!


Its all good and all and hazardously I say the word 'top'.


Top is an amazing tool, don't get me wrong but its very limited. The major flaw of top (and its not really a flaw) is that Top is limited to one machine. When you have a cluster of say 20-300 you need more powerful tools.

Also top doesn't measure things like the current latency and other things they need to know at the moment.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: