Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

10b would be just over 25% more people - therefore even if we manage to reduce per-capita environmental impact by 25% (which is evidently no mean feat), we'd still just be treading water.


Duh, can't do maths - 25% population increase requires 20% impact decrease to stay still. Still seems unlikely to me across a 30 year timeline.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: