> It was the final step in the method of claim one – “moving said tray cart to said proximate end of said scanning device” – that was added at the PTO to overcome the examiner’s initial obviousness concern.
So the lynchpin of the case earning this company $100m is the idea of moving trays on a cart from the exit to the entrance.
> It was the final step in the method of claim one – “moving said tray cart to said proximate end of said scanning device” – that was added at the PTO to overcome the examiner’s initial obviousness concern.
So the lynchpin of the case earning this company $100m is the idea of moving trays on a cart from the exit to the entrance.
https://www.eff.org/files/2016/12/22/security_point_ruling.p...