Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> There is a belief that the scientific methodology will lead to truth.

Except scientists themselves do not espouse such belief. They know what they know, and also they know what they don't know; the scientific methology, too, is also based on knowledge; there is no place for "belief" in scientific research.

When a scientist puts forward a hypothesis, which is not, strictly speaking, knowledge (yet), it does not mean that they "believe" in it, either; it's remains just that - a hypothesis, which gets thrown away as soon as it is disproven.

One could argue that knowledge requires some kind of faith - you have to believe that you know something (while in reality you may or may not); but much of the knowlege we possess is "hard knowledge" - the kind that prevents us from taking actions that would definitely hurt us, for example; scientific knowledge is just as "hard," and so is the scientific method.



> Except scientists themselves do not espouse such belief.

Every religion has members who know what they know.

> there is no place for "belief" in scientific research.

There is a belief that the scientific method is optimal for discovering truth. How well it works, is not relevant to the fact that it's a practice. This isn't complicated or doublespeak.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: