>>>>You can't expect to offload the responsibility of neutralizing all of that to the users.
You dont need to neutralize all. Just enough.
Our system of jury by peers seems to work incredibly well. There is no reason why big tech cant implement a big system at scale to rely on users to police itself, except of course they would lose control themselves.
What is malicious/spam/libel/problem du jour?
Like Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart said about obscene:
A jury is capped at 12 plus some alternates. A script kiddie can spin up hundreds or thousands of "users" overnight and quickly the spammers/bad actors ARE the police.
There is no reason why big tech cant implement a big system at scale to rely on users to police itself, except of course they would lose control themselves.
Web3 and crypto already exist and HN overwhelmingly hates them. This is like crocodile tears.
You dont need to neutralize all. Just enough.
Our system of jury by peers seems to work incredibly well. There is no reason why big tech cant implement a big system at scale to rely on users to police itself, except of course they would lose control themselves.
What is malicious/spam/libel/problem du jour?
Like Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart said about obscene:
"I know it when I see it."