Oh. I said, you're accusing me of x, and of y. That is because he said "you are either an x" that's the first accusation, "or a y." the second accusation. So there can be no confusion then, I can present the fact he considered accusing me of being an x, to disprove I'm a y, and the fact he accused me of being a y, as evidence I'm not an x.
Nobody tell it about "not".