Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There were several interesting studies these past years : one from google, one from NetApp, an older one from the CERN:

Google 2007: http://research.google.com/pubs/pub32774.html

Carnegie Mellon 2005: http://www.usenix.org/events/fast07/tech/schroeder.html

CERN on data integrity: http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=3&sess...

NetApp 2010: http://synergy-ds.com/netapp/wp-7005.pdf



I may be remembering the Google study and/or something else from about that time frame. I have a vague recollection now of both Google's opinion and and something else that had at least some degree of separation from Google.

Thanks very much for the informative response. I'll have a look at these (as soon as I talk myself down sufficiently from my guilt over my price-motivated Seagate purchase ;-).

In part, I also pushed the button on Seagate (despite the 1 TB "click of death" episode from a few years ago) because a recent WD laptop HD purchase went rather bad with incessant parking that is apparently inherent to the model's firmware. I finally fixed that on the XP Pro machine it lives in by finding and setting to run on start-up:

http://sites.google.com/site/quiethdd/ [1]

But not before SMART reported significant aging for the drive. Which rather pissed me off. (I should pull it and RMA it -- 5 year warranty.)

So, that helped lead me to Hitachi. Then the price inflation, plus the news that WD is buying Hitachi, and I figured I'd give Seagate another go.

I hate purchasing consumer electronics, these days.

--

1. Which I found at about the same time I learned I could tweak the relevant settings manually -- so, I went with the pre-packaged implementation.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: