Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I definitely did not imply there should be a moral imperative.

Moroever, the 'making the audience contemplate her culpability' in having attacked a man before she was hit, is definitely the 'verbotten' form of depiction, the reason being too many people would feel that would somehow justify domestic violence.

This is the essence of 'what cannot be put on screen' - ideas that are counter narrative or don't fit nicely.

A man hitting a woman is tricky, but a man hitting a woman who is harrassing him is much worse because it might seem to imply the 'guy had a good reason to hit her', even if that 'implication' isn't necessarily obvious, lot of people would freak out anyhow.

In 'Gone Girl' the film, you can see the woman was the villain, making 'fake claims' of being raped etc. - this was met with severe blowback, because some people didn't want to see the depiction (and therefore possible justification of the narrative) of woman lying abour rape. The 'social justice imperative' is to 'believe women' and so from their view, it's not something they want on the big screen. The blow back is strong enough that it pushes producers and writers away from those kinds of things. Nobody in the industry wants to be see as 'that guy' aka that 'guy' who may secrety be a 'trump guy' etc..

Unlesss they have a lot of power and people give them the benefit of the doubt, aka Scorsese.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: