Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

can people stop using animal names for their models and methods? At least with LlaMA, the name was an acronym, but Gorilla is clearly just marketing. flagged.


Why should they, and it seems very silly to flag a post for their preference of name. Are users on Twitter birds? Or is Mastodon filled with elephants? Name is merely a symbol in today's world Google is synonymous to search but Google is not just search anymore. I'm honestly curious about your gripe with it.


Some people confuse research with production. Imagine if Einstein named his theory the Theory of Chimps, just to get attention.


Imagine working in the Manhattan project outside Manhattan.


There's loads of stuff in physics with silly sounding names. quarks, anyons, etc.


What's the point of research if it can't gain attention, how many people really understood or even know about some space magic, before interstellar kind of managed to ELI5. Research is meant for everyone, and in today's world you bring attention to it with catchy names. I wonder if Google was named PageRank Algorithm runner, how many would've even used it.


If Gorilla upsets you, wait till you hear about Cummingtonite!


Between "hugging face" and "oobabooga", I already gave up on the field's ability to come up with sensible names for things.


What's super confusing is people on r/LocalLLaMA often just refer too it as "ooba". The actual repo is https://github.com/oobabooga/text-generation-webui and you notice that oobabooga is actually the username, but a lot of non-technical people who don't use git are also playing around with stuff, and "text-generation-webui" is so generic as to be completely forgettable, and "oobabooga" is confusing and too long to say, so colloquially it's referred to as ooba.


Animal names in tech have been used forever. Gopher, Python, Mouse, worm. And they also make great book covers.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: