Most of what we teach undergraduates is about the knowledge science is produced, rather than about the process of doing science itself.
Which is not entirely a useless endeavor; if you don't know about what has already been discovered, how can you build on it and go further? How will you know what has already been tried?
Which is not entirely a useless endeavor; if you don't know about what has already been discovered, how can you build on it and go further? How will you know what has already been tried?