That would be an after the fact justification, which could be used to justify ba... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		balls187 on June 17, 2024 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: DJI ban passes the House and moves on to the Senat... That would be an after the fact justification, which could be used to justify banning any company that operates in China.

kube-system on June 17, 2024 [–]

Not every company, just the ones with military relevance. But for the purposes of a national security discussion, the situation that is being planned for is not the current-state peacetime -- it is the after the fact contingency.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact