I sense personal animosity and almost feel honored that it is behind a throwaway account.
The talk is publicly available (in Polish) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChEsmwe7YN0. Which part of it do you find objectionable? In particular, a large portion was directly related to biases, limitations, dangers, and general misconceptions. I'm not sure how this accounts for lobbying rather than educating. And as anyone who has ever seen my social media, I am open with my liberal views.
Ad paper - it is an interesting pick. First, what is particularly unclear or confusing in the abstract? Second, right now, it is one of the most cited in quantum education. You are invited to see research publications on quantum information - rather than, as in this case, education & software.
The talk is publicly available (in Polish) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChEsmwe7YN0. Which part of it do you find objectionable? In particular, a large portion was directly related to biases, limitations, dangers, and general misconceptions. I'm not sure how this accounts for lobbying rather than educating. And as anyone who has ever seen my social media, I am open with my liberal views.
Ad paper - it is an interesting pick. First, what is particularly unclear or confusing in the abstract? Second, right now, it is one of the most cited in quantum education. You are invited to see research publications on quantum information - rather than, as in this case, education & software.