Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Is a MOP (like CLOS) going to bring substantial advantage to extensibility? My intuition says yes, but I can't test this hypothesis without thousands of plugin developers. Has any (meta) study even been done?


I think Elisp already implements a lot of things that CLOS would give you, like around method combinators (with defadvice, if I remember correctly). It's probably more ad-hoc, and you might want some extra customizations on top, but I'm not sure.


Elisp already has a (partial, but for most purposes complete) implementation of CLOS as part of the cl-lib package.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: