Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The messenger doesn't need to stand by his message


Two things can be true: The message is good, and the messenger is also hypocritical.

Technically, there was no ad hominem fallacy. RcouF1uZ4gsC just argued that Khosla is a hypocrite.


Agreed, but under a charitable interpretation.

Under a less charitable one, RcouF1uZ4gsC was discrediting the message by using the messenger's ``ethos''.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: