Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"lots of false positives"

Maybe this is okay when we're talking about plagiarism and you can review manually, but humans can't reliably identify LLM written text



Totally agreed. I'm personally only relying on it to identify cases of material which was directly (with minimal changes) copied from a third party source without attribution.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: