I'm still a fan of Deno and hoping it wins out but
> more pragmatic (e.g. Node/NPM compatibility)
Both projects are good on this front. Deno actually originally explicitly promised NOT to work on node compatibility to "move the industry forward". They realized this was a failing move and backtracked (which has been a little controversial amongst the core base)
> with better technology choices (e.g. Rust vs. Zig)
I think it's a little silly to take the choice of language as a "technology choice". Both are new languages, both still have a lot to prove, and both have pros and cons the other lacks
> more pragmatic (e.g. Node/NPM compatibility)
Both projects are good on this front. Deno actually originally explicitly promised NOT to work on node compatibility to "move the industry forward". They realized this was a failing move and backtracked (which has been a little controversial amongst the core base)
> with better technology choices (e.g. Rust vs. Zig)
I think it's a little silly to take the choice of language as a "technology choice". Both are new languages, both still have a lot to prove, and both have pros and cons the other lacks