Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"But in their eyes, it was a valuable use of their time to harrass a 20yo girl"

Ah, out comes the "girl card". I instantly understand why you were trolled, then. Demanding special treatment because of gender or race is an excellent way to inspire animosity and often leads to attacks back along the same lines by which you claim exceptionality.



Mentioning that she's a girl isn't demanding special treatment.

Some people do have a problem with girls. You do know that "troll" is a bad thing, right?


So why say it then? There is no other credible reason to mention her gender like that. It's a plea to victimhood, consciously or not I can't say. If you have a plausible alternative explanation to why someone would emphasise their minority status when complaining about being mistreated in some way, I'm all ears.

I'm not even sure what you mean by "trolling" so I can't say whether I agree or not. I suppose that if you define trolling as "saying bad things" then yeah, it's a bad thing. I suspect, though, that whether something is a troll or not is largely in the eye of the beholder. Many Christians probably consider the "There is probably no God" bus stickers to be a highly offensive troll, but I don't think they're "bad" at all.


> So why say [girl] then?

Because it helped identify something about the troll, namely it's one who has a problem with women. And it outed someone who seems to think that that's okay.

As the man says, here's your sign.


Dude, if I wanted to plea for victimhood, I've got a lot better cards to pull than the girl card.

Here is why I brought it up, and it had nothing to do with playing the victim:

The "men" who attack people like me and Kathy Sierra are intimidated and disgusted by the fact that it is useless, artsy fartsy, outsider women who are getting so much attention. And so their trolling is evident of this, because it is of a disgustingly sexual nature.

They think they are vastly superior to us, but they can't think of any better way to attack us than flooding programming IRC channels with speculations about the viscosity & odor of our sexual juices (me) or Photoshopping us being strangled by a pair of women's panties (Kathy Sierra).

Certainly those beta males don't seem to understand this, but that kind of trolling doesn't make them look powerful, it typifies their weakness and demonstrates that they are afraid of women and don't understand the nature of real power.

And saying I'm playing the girl card and pleaing to victimhood just because I mention the very relevant fact of my gender, on a forum that is almost entirely male... well, let me know the next time somebody claims you fucked an entire conference -- hey, cumdumpster, how's it feel? -- and that's why people read your blog.

Anyway, I don't in general agree with crying "sexism"[1], but sometimes the shoe fits.

And I don't think anybody is in my way, stopping me from being the best I want to be, blah blah blah. But they are still obnoxious, insecure little sexist fucks.

[1] Hey, look, here's an essay I wrote for O'Reilly about this! http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/womenintech/2007/09/12/i-don...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: