It's a limitation of all epidemiological studies. These are a great way to target more expensive randomized controlled trials that are also more invasive by definition. Nutrition science has lots of those and needs more.
In an N=1 intervention study, I too found fiber to be health supporting, but that wasn't randomized or controlled.
In an N=1 intervention study, I too found fiber to be health supporting, but that wasn't randomized or controlled.