Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Oh yeah for sure. Most people seem to accept that 35ppd is "good enough" but not actually at-par with a high quality high-dpi monitor.

I agree with you - I would personally consider 35ppd to be the floor for usability for this purpose. It's good in a pinch (need a nice workstation setup in a hotel room?) but I would not currently consider any extant hardware as full-time replacements for a good monitor.



Most people in what age group?

I'm 53 and the Quest 3 is perfectly good as a monitor replacement.


I'm in the same boat. Due to my vision not being perfect even after correction, a Quest 3 is entirely sufficient.


I keep hearing this argument, and it baffles me. I find that, as I age and my vision gets worse, I need progressively finer text rendering. Using same-size displays (27") at the same distance, with text the same physical size on screen, 1440p gives me a much worse reading experience than 4k with 2x scaling.


Are you saying ppd requirements for comfortable usage vary with age?


They vary with quality of eyesight which usually correlates with age.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: