Garbage in, garbage out. Beautiful code in, beautiful code out.
Code "quality" is a judgement call. Just like some LLMs, I'll repeat your question: What do you consider quality code?
I treat all code from LLM, search, stackoverflow, etc, as "sample code" that requires review and most likely modification, or writing the code from scratch. Your abilities and laziness may vary.
Also, there are reasons other than code quality not to trust LLMs.
Thank you! This is a good way to critically think about the code. Sort of like when Chegg was a thing and to answer your math homework, you'd have to adapt someone else's solution to a problem similar to yours. Easier than deriving from first principles but not quite asking your friend to do it for you.
Code "quality" is a judgement call. Just like some LLMs, I'll repeat your question: What do you consider quality code?
I treat all code from LLM, search, stackoverflow, etc, as "sample code" that requires review and most likely modification, or writing the code from scratch. Your abilities and laziness may vary.
Also, there are reasons other than code quality not to trust LLMs.