Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think you missed my point, which was that the Wired article is citing the number from the second half of that sentence: "and 135 million are active in just the stream." (not the first number, which includes people who just +1'd an app)

I don't think the statement in the blog post could be much clearer, you just have to read the whole sentence :)



yeah, i watched an old reposted matt cutts video the other day on G+, proud to be part of the 135 000 000.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: