Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I am not sure I would be smacking the reporter around as they are. What stands out to me is, here we have a 100k car that we cannot run the heat and get good range out of. Here we have a 100k car that if don't drive at some contrived speeds while keeping the climate control down low we cannot get good range out of.

Frankly, if I cannot drive a car at a comfortable temperature the car or the technology behind it is not ready for prime time.

I am still curious what the user is displayed versus what is in all these logs. We also have other stories linked in the original thread of other Tesla S drivers who had range issues as well.

Musk is not doing his brand any service especially when he highlights the user only operating the interior climate control in the low seventies, really you mean we cannot do that with a 100k car and have good range? Really?

Its a matter of expectations. With a 30 to 40k car similar to the Focus EV or Leaf people will expect limitations of this sort, for a 100k car people expect it to just work.



Broder (the NYT reporter) cites a $101,000 car, but the Model S pricing doesn't come close:

http://www.teslamotors.com/models/options

It could be an honest mistake, but it seems more likely the inflated price is meant to solicit comments like yours.


From your own page, with options, it can be configured to be more than $101,000. Its likely that they would have a fully loaded demo car, so this is probably right.


But he did run the heat, the car never dropped below 60F and averaged 72F.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: