Nobody said that anyway. I doubt there's such a thing as non-side-effecting lang... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		vemv on May 13, 2013 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: STM in Haskell Nobody said that anyway. I doubt there's such a thing as non-side-effecting languages :)

tel on May 13, 2013 [–]

Sure there are, they just are interpreted in side-effecting interpreters. Lambda calculus comes to mind.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact