Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Did you even read the article/mail? The author makes a lucid argument which you totally fail to address:

> And so—before the capability was made public, it _likely_ wouldn't

> have been used against mere political nuisances, at least not without

> the additional cost of creating a solid pretext for the resulting

> intelligence. But now this deterrent is gone: the burden of utter secrecy

> is reduced. And if these programs are not eliminated, greatly curtailed,

> or made moot, we can expect them to be employed much more freely.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: