Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I read the intro as "I like Rust, I'm going to twist my requirements to match", but that may be a bad read of the author.


That wasn't my intention. I didn't decide to like Rust before trying it, I tried it to see if I liked it. I wrote up what I've learned so far. Probably some day this post will seem naive to me, but for now it's the best I could manage.


Fair - if I were to write up what I'd want from a new systems language it would be: statically typed with some sort of generics capability, natively compiled, not GC'd (I like the idea of ObjC's ARC, though I can't say I've used it), and with first-class support for concurrent or parallel programming - this also sounds an awful lot like Rust, and I don't think I was particularly aiming for it, it's just got a good set of features and design goals for a modern systems language.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: