>single moms who don't get anything for their children.
Which is good, because then there's no incentive to produce many children just to cash in their basic income. Being a single mom in Western nations is mostly a business model anyway (either the father or state has to pay and considering that more than 70% of break-offs are initiated by the woman), and it usually results in children who are more prone to become criminals and dropouts.
We can disincentivize having each next children so our family converges on "mom, dad and 2-4 children", which would be pretty nice actually won't it?
While building some savings for those children, larger when there's a lot of them.
Western nations sponsor single moms and get a surplus of single moms, that's what BIG ends.
Which is good, because then there's no incentive to produce many children just to cash in their basic income. Being a single mom in Western nations is mostly a business model anyway (either the father or state has to pay and considering that more than 70% of break-offs are initiated by the woman), and it usually results in children who are more prone to become criminals and dropouts.