Maybe you don't, however the comment was really more generally targeted given that we're discussing it here. However when you start renaming things, other things start to not make sense. For instance-
"It's important to note that ARM64 includes a full 32-bit compatibility mode that allows running normal 32-bit ARM code without any changes and without emulation."
If ARM64 == AArch64 (which is what you decided), then no, this doesn't make sense. ARMv8 includes both AArch64 and optionally AArch32, the former running A64, the latter running traditional ARM. There are ARMv8 designs that actually can't run any traditional 32-bit code.
As I pointed out, that's Apple renaming it, not me. I'm just following their lead.
As for 32-bit compatibility, that has nothing to do with renaming, it's just me being imprecise. It would be equally imprecise if I had used "AArch64". Thank you for pointing it out, though, I've fixed it to say that it is the A7 that includes 32-bit compatibility.
"It's important to note that ARM64 includes a full 32-bit compatibility mode that allows running normal 32-bit ARM code without any changes and without emulation."
If ARM64 == AArch64 (which is what you decided), then no, this doesn't make sense. ARMv8 includes both AArch64 and optionally AArch32, the former running A64, the latter running traditional ARM. There are ARMv8 designs that actually can't run any traditional 32-bit code.