thanks but I was more hoping for something describing the process used to decide if/how/when to incorporate pull requests, roadmap, software quality before releasing, ... Do maintainers discuss to reach consensus, do they vote, something else?
It could be that this is all Docker Inc's prerogative, which is fine. I just don't see it spelled out.
And in general the rest of that hack/ directory. We use a process that is completely open and not at all limited to Docker, inc. Several core maintainers (and countless contributors) are not employed at Docker inc.
Generally speaking the reference for how we organize is Linux.
It could be that this is all Docker Inc's prerogative, which is fine. I just don't see it spelled out.