Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How about this for a reason to find this tactic objectionable: USB is a standard with a licensing body which mandates the acceptable USB protocol behavior of vendors that slap the approved USB logo on their product/box, part of the licensing agreement which Palm signed mandates that they supply their proper vendor id (in this case 0 × 0830 (Palm Inc.)) during negotiation. What Palm did was change the vendor id they were supplying to Apple's vendor id. Palm is in violation of a licensing agreement they willingly entered into. If they want to follow this tack they should at least be forced to remove the USB-compatible logo from their product and its marketing materials.


  If they want to follow this tack they should at least be
  forced to remove the USB-compatible logo from their product
  and its marketing materials.
This sounds reasonable.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: