Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Supporting standards is pretty unimportant when you have an interface to ruin, ads to sneak in, an unasked os to support, etc... /s

To be on topic, there isn't much activity in the bug topic: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616605. Two blockers landed in Fx30, but that is well within the statistical margins of randomness.



Wow, just scanned your comment history. You really have boner about slagging on Firefox. What is your story? Every browser has good points and bad points, but for some reason you myopically focus on the shortcomings, real or perceived, of firefox.

I understand fanboy mentality of being invested in something and over promoting it, but I don't understand where you are coming from. Care to elaborate?


Even if my comments (those few I posted already, what shouldn't be enough of a basis for such conclusions) seem to indicate that I dislike Firefox, that is not the case. I have little against Firefox itself, so much I use it as my main browser, and the Beta as secondary. Though, I have to admit I went over with the above comment, as more than half was off-topic (and most likely the source of down voting).

What I do not like is some of the decisions Mozilla leaders made lately. For example, I am clearly against the Directory Tiles or Australis in it's current form, but I support the rapid release cycle, as it clearly threw back Fx into the race and is now one of the top two browsers.

what was also hasty without the 'addons are compatible by default' and Mozilla Maintenance Service




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: