Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If the Tor leak thing is true, this could add to the evidence for the common speculation that Satoshi is a collective pseudonym.


how so?


I think the implication he is trying to make is this:

If it was a collective of people it is(might be) more likely that one of them is incompetent(and didn't configure TOR properly) where-as if it was a single competent/careful individual there's a smaller chance of a TOR mis-configuration and resulting IP-address leak.

I don't think it lends much credence to the 'multiple entities' theory at all personally, but that's the best I could come up with. Feel free to correct.


thanks - makes sense




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: