Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I see they have an MIT license, which is great, but I have a theoretical copyright question. If they didn't license out the code and, instead, made a background-image-generating website, who would own the copyright to the computer generated images? I'm guessing they would but does anyone know for sure?


It would probably depend on the background-image-generating websites TOS.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: