Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Does anyone know why the specific decisions and guidelines used here may have been made?

Presumably the guidelines were designed in such a way as to disqualify all previous definitions of "the first personal computer", allowing the author to select one even older and more obscure.



While this is true, the point of the article isn't to choose a valid first computer.

It is a funny way to step through computing history with more and more obscure devices.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: