Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think you miss the point. She describes herself to be happy 9 out of 10 times because she is also unable to notice the real dangers that fear is there to help us handle. While it may be great to not feel afraid, as the article points out it also leads her to risky behaviour that most healthy persons would avoid.


> I think you miss the point.

I do get gwern's implication of fear being a gift. His applauding of fear was (presumably) in response to Rachel Feltman's (WashingtonPost's journalist) "a bad thing" appraisal of her lack of fear during those two incidents of being held at knifepoint and those two other incidents of being held at gunpoint. Whereas you completely miss the point I was trying to make. That, it matters not that in her entire lifetime she failed to feel afraid in those four instances (of being held at knifepoint or gunpoint) -- and we do not yet know if she actually handled them intelligently or not (i.e., had the time and energy to think through her responses instead of them being, say, flippantly knee-jerk) -- as they are nothing in the large scheme of an entire of life of being mostly happy. Say, she has lived for some 50 years with this condition, then she has been happy the whole 45 years. An ordinary "healthy person" would have been happy say 25 years with ordinary "healthy" incidents of fear, even trauma, peppered throughout their lifetime.

> She describes herself to be happy 9 out of 10 times because she is also unable to notice the real dangers [...]

What 'real dangers' are they (other than the four incidences noted above)?

> [...] real dangers that fear is there to help us handle.

How exactly does fear help you handle 'real dangers'? It seems that SM had no trouble handling those four incidents (of being held at knifepoint or gunpoint) admirably. Most "healthy people" on the other hand would cringe/freeze and even develop "traumas", much less have the energy to think through their responses.

> While it may be great to not feel afraid, as the article points out it also leads her to risky behaviour that most healthy persons would avoid.

You are merely speculating trying to justify your fear of lack of fear, unless by 'risky behaviour' you only refer to those four incidents (of being held at knifepoint or gunpoint) which this women seems to have handled admirably.

Being fearless is indeed under appreciated, even at HN.


That's because most healthy people are wrong. There are no risks or dangers worth fearing.


If you want to stay alive that is blatantly false.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: