"Saying that the logo is just a small part of the overall identity is really dumb."
His point is that it makes no sense to evaluate a logo on it's own without greater context of how it fits with a fuller identity.
"saying that the general public is unqualified to comment on it is even dumber."
Why? Doing an identity is hard work and it requires more thought than just looking at a screen, evaluating it against something which it isn't even replacing, and then making a gut reaction. I wouldn't be surprised if most people went into the discussion with a bias introduction ("checkout this ugly logo!") without any rationale.
"if 90% of people don't like it, it is by definition a bad logo."
>if 90% of people don't like it, it is by definition a bad logo.
Bzzt. WRONG.
If 90% of "prospective 18-20 year olds" don't like it, then and only then is it a bad logo. Everyone else really should probably stay out of it since they aren't who the logo is for.
You're kidding, right? It's just as important that the State, parents, alumni, research partners etc etc like it too. 18-20 year olds are probably one of the least important stakeholders at a research university.
"The symmetry is a smooth (differentiable to all orders) invertible transformation
mapping solutions of the ODE to solutions of the ^ODE^. Invertible means the Jacobian is nonzero:
x'x y'y - x'y y'x != 0"
Here's how I broke it down, it has been a little while since I've been in a math class
* Differentiable to all orders means that for each derivation, no cusp will appear in the curve. A cusp means that the next order of derivation will not be defined at that point on the curve.
* 'The symmetry is a smooth invertible transformation mapping solutions of the X to solutions of the Y'.
- I now understand that the stuff I just paraphrased means that it's just a mapping, and that it's invertible.
- ODE = Ordinary Differential Equation. Cool. Rings a bell. It looks like ^ODE^ is just the next order of derivation? And this mapping, the symmetry, is just describing how the next order of derivation relates to the first (I think, that is not exactly clear in the time I spent).
* Invertible means the Jacobian is nonzero... Describing to a sophomore that a mapping is invertible in these terms is pretty vague (this section is supposed to be accesible to sophomores). The Jacobian is the determinant of a particular form of matrix, http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Jacobian.html
So aside from that last bit it came apart okay. I have noticed that when you have completed a certain amount of math (or any topic) it is hard to exclude certain bits or to describe things in a simpler fashion
If you're on the platform, you'll be able to see the time even if your phone isn't working. So the mobile app will be useful if you're en route to the station and need to know how many minutes you have left.
On top of the obvious (resize to largest dimension, crop smallest) I'm guessing they set an anchor point on the image rather than use the center.
For example, the pig's face isn't centered. So rather than returning the center of the image, they crop the sides proportionally to the anchor point on the pig's face.
Edit: Nup. They just crop it down the middle. If you're the developer feel free to steal the above.
I would guess they pull from the wiki commons and then use typical JPG or PNG algorithm libraries to stretch or compress the image. There's probably some AI to retrieve images that don't need to be stretched much so that it looks natural.
> The provided images are for layout purposes and each image we use for this project is released under the creative commons license (CC BY-SA). For more information visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
So, if you want to use the images for more than just layouts, you have to double check the license and ask the author. For this we will link to each photographer's flickr page. Furthermore, we assume no liability.