Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's because the infographic is highlighting the fact that 25% of the much-touted jobs created by the movie industry are menial positions primarily staffed by high schoolers that would probably not flat-out disappear even if the movie industry did. The actual BLS report[1] he's citing does indeed include all those categories you're talking about, and that's where the 361,900 number comes from. I agree, though — this infographic is not very enlightening. But Maddox's overall point in the article that the infographic comes from[2] seems pretty valid: The movie industry is flat-out lying about the impact it has on employment in order to get the government to take it more seriously.

[1]: http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs038.htm

[2]: http://maddox.xmission.com/



I'm wondering if job losses among high schoolers and teenagers are even a problem we should be concerned with.

I may be completely off base here, but with the exception of gas money in suburbs, I imagine that most of the income from jobs performed by people in high school is discretionary income spent on entertainment (because food and housing are still provided by someone's parents). Now I know this is not universally true, especially in low income communities, but I imagine that loss of discretionary income among this segment of society is adequately replaced by cheap or free internet content.

I would even suggest that society shouldn't even worry too much about the loss of discretionary income that is mostly being spent on goods whose price is falling together with the loss in purchasing power for those goods.


Income isn't the only benefit of a job for teenagers. (They also spend it on eating out.)

Another benefit is that said teenagers learn how to hold a job when failure may not be as expensive as it will be later.


I would like to tack on money management things that are learned when failure is not harsh.


And, they can learn that they better get a good education so they have an alternative to low income jobs before they have to live off said low-income jobs.


Yes, but it's absurd to claim that just because Hollywood goes down and your local cinema closes that these kids will be permanently unemployed because of it. (Note: getting laid off would be a great life lesson for a majority of the youth)

These kids earn disposable income and dispose of it. It's safe to assume that a fair portion of this demographics disposable income is disposed of at their local theatre, whilst simultaneously providing most of the staff there too.

If these kids can no longer dispose of their income at the theatre, then it's safe to assume they'll quickly find somewhere else to dispose of their money. These other locals will receive a boost in business and require hiring more staff, possibly extending shifts into the times when young adults are more prevalent rather than closing at 8pm.


I respectfully disagree. I house a nephew, 19, in an urban area, from a rural background to give him the opportunity to go to school and establish roots out of the backwoods.

Without an entry level job, he would have no way to pay for community college and commuting- as the pell grants and available loans are simply insufficient. Even with free room and board.


I'll chime here as being in a similar boat as your nephew was.

Nearly 15 years ago I took a job at the local Wal-Mart as a high-school sophomore (15 1/2 was the minimum required age, with restrictions on hours worked), mostly so I could save up enough money to buy my own computer, or enough fairly recent parts to build something respectable. To my parents this was preferable to me hitching a ride with high school seniors in the computer club to go dumpster diving every weekend for 386s in the back of colleges, company headquarters, and landfills. Though to be honest, it yielded quite a respectable stack of working computers.

I used the computer I built from my Wal-Mart money (Pentium 200MHz with 64MB of RAM) to learn how to program, enough about relational databases, and create dynamic websites (we're talking mid-90s here), so in my latter half of high school I was building basic e-commerce sites for larger local companies to save up tuition money to go to a state college and not have to take out loans. And to play games, of course.

-----

Granted, I think most of the kids I worked with mostly spent their money on music, movies and fast food, and didn't show up when they didn't need spending money. Or to hook up with their coworkers (Kim from the shoe department, leave me alone!). I ended up taking care of 1/3rd of the store floor myself, which really ticked them off when I quit.


I completely agree about 15 years ago. But you can now get a Raspberry Pi for about $30.

Is it the latest and greatest iOS or Android device? No. But it is a platform for exploring, learning and being entertained.

A question to you that I've asked myself, would you rather have less buying power today and access to the Internet in its current form or more buying power and access to the Internet 15 years ago?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: